This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2022, 13, 1268–1283, doi:10.3762/bjnano.13.105
Figure 1: Images of four distantly related and differently sized cribellate spiders with same-sized nanorippl...
Figure 2: Principle geometry of the interaction of a nanofiber with a periodic sinusoidal surface topography ...
Figure 3: The three possible states: A (a, b), B (c, d), and C (e, f). (a, c, e) show the total energies Etot...
Figure 4: Transition from adhesive to anti-adhesive state for varying fiber radii ranging between 10 and 200 ...
Figure 5: Relative total energy for different characteristic lengths λ for a fiber radius of R = 15 nm (the o...
Figure 6: Scanning electron micrograph of electrospun nanofibers. One can see the random orientation of the i...
Figure 7: Peel-off force measurement of polished (a) and LIPSS-covered (b) steel samples. The applied weights...
Figure 8: Peel-off force per unit length measurement results from Table 1 and Table 2 (mean values) visualized as bar plot....
Figure 9: LIPSS-covered and polished titanium alloy surfaces after peel-off of an electrospun nonwoven. While...
Figure 10: (a) Photography of a laser-structured titanium alloy sample after ultrafast laser processing. The c...
Figure 11: (a) Photography of the setup for the electrospinning process. (b) Top view of the spun sample after...
Figure 12: Measurement principle of the newly established peel-off test avoiding edge effects. Blue: sample wi...
Figure 13: Setup used for the peel-off force measurements.